A lot of attention is now shifting to exosomes, the tiny packets released by MSCs. These exosomes carry enzymes, proteins, and microRNAs that can break down amyloid, reduce inflammation, protect synapses, and support nerve growth. Because exosomes are so small, they can cross the blood–brain barrier more easily than whole cells. That makes them very attractive as a possible future therapy: instead of infusing millions of living stem cells and hoping some reach the brain, you might deliver a standardized dose of exosomes that are designed to get in and deliver their “cargo” where it’s needed.
All of this sounds exciting, and it is—but here’s the honest reality. Most of the strong evidence so far comes from mice and cell cultures, not from large human trials. The studies in people are still early, usually small and focused first on safety, not on proving clear long-term benefit. When stem cells are given through a vein, many of them end up in the lungs, liver, or spleen rather than in the brain. Direct delivery into the spinal fluid or brain is technically possible but more invasive and carries its own risks. Also, by the time Alzheimer’s is clearly visible, a lot of brain cells are already gone; stem cells and exosomes can support surviving cells and help clean up the environment, but they cannot bring dead neurons back to life.
There are also practical issues: older patients’ own stem cells may be “tired” and less powerful, while donor cells raise questions about immune reactions, regulation, and quality control. The right dose, timing, and frequency of any stem cell or exosome treatment are still not clearly defined. So at this stage, anyone offering stem cells for Alzheimer’s should be upfront and call it what it is: experimental.

